A 46,000 square foot parcel at Howard and Ashland in Rogers Park that once was home to the Lerner newspaper facility has sat vacant for more than 10 years. The City of Chicago, at the request of the community, has issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for redevelopment of the site. Although the City does not own the site, they have authority through eminent domain to acquire it. The RFP will provide a much-needed push to get site development to occur.
New development on Howard Street couldn’t come at a better time. “New mixed-use development will really benefit the community,” said Amy Campbell, the Howard Street Special Service Area Manager. “Revitalization on Howard Street is linked to development on that site. The timing of the RFP also coincides with the release of the Commercial Corridor Plan for Howard Street,” said Campbell. “Developers now have a useful tool to guide their development, based on the community’s wants and needs.”
The site is within the boundaries of the Howard/Paulina Tax Increment Finance (TIF) district. TIF assistance is potentially available for proposals that demonstrate tangible public benefits, including affordable housing, new retail or environmentally sustainable features.
The aim of the RFP is to solicit proposals for commercial, residential and/or mixed-use development that comply with the new B2-3 zoning designation and are consistent with the surrounding area. Since the site is located in the Howard/Paulina TIF area, it is also subject to the vision of the TIF plan, which seeks to make the TIF redevelopment area “an important activity center contributing to the neighborhood and community focus of the Howard/Paulina Area.”
DevCorp North, the business, community and economic development organization in Rogers Park, provided the City of Chicago’s Dept. of Planning and Development with detailed information about other developments occurring on Howard Street for the RFP, including Bob Coe’s development at 1523-25 Howard and the new Gale Park Community Center being developed across the street from the site.
“The community has been waiting too long for something to happen with that site, it was time the city stepped in and took over,” said Kimberly Bares, Executive Director of DevCorp North. “That’s why DevCorp North submitted a letter of support for the City of Chicago to initially place the property on the City’s acquisition list, which was supposed to light a fire under the current owner to move forward with developing the property. When that didn’t happen, we supported the City in putting together a RFP for someone else to develop that site. Rogers Park and Howard Street deserve good development that enhances and serves the needs of the neighborhood, not vacant sites and inattentive property owners.”
A hard copy of the RFP is available at DevCorp North’s office, 1557 W Howard Street, or downtown at the Department of Planning and Development in City Hall. A pre-submittal conference will be held at 10am on January 8, 2007 in conference room 1003A of City Hall, 121 N. LaSalle. The due date for submittal to the city is February 5th.
Blognotes:
The community... it's for the community. Filling the community up with the propaganda that our community needs study says this - our community needs study says that.
The whole timing on this is very suspicious. 51 days until the Aldermanic elections. What's Alderman Moore have to say about all this? Where's his name on all these so-called new plans? Are you telling us it was all DevCorp North?
And another thing to the clueless wonders at DevCorp North. To tout Mr. Coe as a reason to move forward is nothing more than another one of the many reasons Ms. Kimberly Bares should be fired! Ms. Bares has no clue what the community needs. She is nothing more than a political 'hired gun' for Alderman Moore.
17 comments:
Haven't we heard this information before?
Why again? Why now?
Consider this: with eminent domain the developers would have to go through the 'RFP' process and the 'best' would be chosen.
Assuming all parties involved and oh so concerned about this long vacant weed patch would have 'influence' on who is chosen.
The circle is complete. Which contributor will it be?
According to Hugh:
Watch to see if the alderman will admit that he plans to extend the Howard TIF. The Howard Paulina TIF was established in 1988 and is scheduled to expire in 2011 during Moore's next term.
Howard/Paulina TIF
Date TIF Created: 10/14/1988
Termination Date: 10/14/2011
Size: 32 Acres
Over the last two decades the Howard TIF has diverted over $10M in property tax dollars AWAY from our schools and our County Health system and TOWARD the Alderman's developer pals including James DiMatteo, John Terzakis, Rudy Mulder, Jay Johnson, and DevCorp North.
See if Moore proposes to fix a failed program by extending it.
Of course he will try to extend the TIF, it beats working for the constituents dosen't it?
It'll "pass" with flying colors and we won't even know until after the fact. There will be a few obscure flyers positioned for XYZ to see and that'll be the majority approval.
Terzakis is a bottom-feeder who purchases access to elected officials and uses insider info to snatch up & hold properties in the path of development, holding neighborhoods hostage with vacant lots.
Moore is arranging a taxpayer-funded payday for a campaign contributor and spinning it as getting tough on a developer.
“The community has been waiting too long for something to happen with that site, it was time the city stepped in and took over,” said Kimberly Bares, Executive Director of DevCorp North.
... deftly avoiding WHY it's gone so long:
the incompetence of Joseph A. Moore.
Something Bares & the community can agree on:
IT'S BEEN TOO LONG
... said Kimberly Bares, Executive Director of DevCorp North. “That’s why DevCorp North submitted a letter of support ...
DevCorp North submitted a letter of support because that's what the City pays DevCorp North to do. DevCorp North submits letters of support for Moore, Moore arranges taxpayer funding for DevCorp North.
City funding of DevCorp North is a bulk-purchase of grassroots support. Why hold community meetings? Why talk to constituents? No need to! Downtown will see a letter from DevCorp North, and conclude "the community is behind this."
... it was time the city stepped in and took over,” said Kimberly Bares, Executive Director of DevCorp North.
The City stepped in in 1988. This property was included in the original map of the Howard-Paulina TIF approved by City Council October 14, 1988.
Moore was elected 1991.
It's been too long.
Now if Moore actually agrees to DEBATES and Howard Street comes up, he has an answer:
"We have an RFP out."
"The aim of the RFP is to solicit proposals ... consistent with the surrounding area."
handguns & ammo
needles & bleach in small bottles
flop house with reasonable hourly rates
dollar store
liquor store
social service agency
empty storefronts in new construction would be consistent with the surrounding neighborhood
"TIF assistance is potentially available for proposals that demonstrate tangible public benefits..."
Here Bares attempts to equate
"TIF reimbursable expenditures"
with
"public benefit."
As if TIF money can be used for anything with some kind of public benefit. Her explanation is consistent with the Daley administration's position that TIF is a general purpose slush fund.
This is a crass oversimplification of this topic. Here is a better brief explanation
How Do TIFs Work?
Spending the Money
Carol says: "why aren't they taking a stand against this?"
Taking a stand against what? Against finally getting the city involved in getting some real development there? Who would be against that? What don't you like about that Carol?
Poor Craigie doesn't understand what this is all about. He thinks we heard this before. He thinks it's all a big conspiracy to get Joe No Moore re-elected.
Craigie, let me try to explain it to you. In fact, try reading what you post instead of just copying it from a DevCorp North press release. It says "The City of Chicago, at the request of the community, has issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for redevelopment of the site."
The previous post reports that the city was attempting to use eminent domain to acquire the property.
RFP vs. eminent domain.
Do you understand the difference between the two posts now Craigie? You moron.
> Last month, I wrote a letter to Joe Moore in which I asked him to vote against the LaSalle Central TIF, and criticized his support of the economically destructed Loyola TIF. He wrote a courteous reply back to me, in which he made it clear he thought I was an idiot...
THANKS a lot for doing that, Paradise.
You know, Moore was part of another little bit of City Council history last November. He was one of 3 Aldermen to vote AGAINST the LaSalle TIF, the 1st 3 votes against any TIF in Chicago history. Check it out:
Divided Roll Call Voting
So just when you think you are wasting your time...
Of course now we will have to listen to Moore talk about his opposition to TIF. No doubt he is hoping this vote will distract us from the 140 TIFs he voted for.
Anyway, thanks again!
Hey RPNAYBOOR -
The RFP is so the city has a solid plan for the property so that they can deed over the property to the successful developer after they use eminent domain. The city doesn't own the property - YOU MORON.
A potential developer could use TIF money to purchase the property from the owner, or use TIF money to remediate the environmental damage to the property. This whole situation may not be that bad for the owner - he may get more money out of the deal than he would have in the open market.
Abe, it's a win-no-matter-what situation for the owner, who will get his money for the property no matter what. I'll bet the current owner was hoping like hell that the city would 'force' the sale because no one wanted to take this 'brownfield' lot off his hands for the money he was asking.
The losers are the taxpayers and citizens who are not plugged into the TIF& Tax Abatement Grift & Graft Chain.
Post a Comment