February 27, 2007

* It's Heating Up to Be a Barn-burner - Updated

Blgonotes: WGN took down the cooked numbers. Calls were made to WGN and they said this was nothing more than a test. WGN needs to address this issue. This is as bad as some bloggers I know.

Updated - 2/28/07

Craig,

Thanks for writing. Yes, our test page of results was mistakenly linked on the live site yesterday. When the error was discovered, we immediately removed it from the site. We apologize for the error.

Thanks,

Amy Mowery
Web producer
WGN-TV

31 comments:

Jarvis_smells_like_piss said...

what's up with dorothy brown getting some major numbers?

Juneway said...

where are these numbers coming from? Are they doing exit polling or what - their numbers look bogus to me Naisy Dolar in 50 is only showing 8%.

Jarvis_smells_like_piss said...

i agree juneway. somee of these numbers look plain wrong. natarus, according to wgn, is getting murdered. Though he may lose, I don't see him losing as badly as they have projected currently...

Jim Witts said...

look at the results for mayor and city clerk. I find it hard to believe that those numbers work out to be the same.

Jarvis_smells_like_piss said...

i think wgn pulled their "results" information. i can't get back to that page. maybe they realized how wrong they were/are...f'ing tribune

RP Dude said...

Uh, I think that was just some sample data they loaded to test the system. The Chicago Board of Elections has not released any election results as of yet. It usually doesn't start to trickle out 'till after 7:00.

Besides, WGN's percentages were similar across all the races. "Testing, test one, two, three...test."

Charlie Didrickson said...

Those are bunk.......

Note that the numbers for Mayor and Clerk are exactly the same.

WhatTheHelen said...

The page is down.

That is BULLSHIT. You can't post fake results then pull them down and say "Oops. Sorry."

estes&lunt said...

WGN really did scare me as I just assumed they were based on sample poll results, or even early/absentee voters, but now that the information in no longer there I feel a little better. Get it together WGN! You're suppose to be a credible news source and you had that up all day!

Tracy said...

You really should retract this incorrect information.
Those numbers were bogus.

Craig Gernhardt said...

Sorry folks, a worm invaded the site, back to comment moderate.

RP Dude said...

Too bad the Chicago Board of Elections Commissioners for the City of Chicago web site is down.

It's 7:00pm. The match is on!

Janice on Ravenswood said...

I was just at the readers blog and you're getting some major endorsements. Good job today Craig. Your site is the best.

RP Dude said...

Oh lookey:

http://www.chicagoelections.com/

It's back up. This is the freshest data you can get.

RP Dude said...

No numbers yet - WTF? - it's ten after...

RP Dude said...

Oh I see, it says: "Results will be updated approximately every 15 minutes."

Carol J. said...

thanx rude

Abe said...

The numbers are up: moore = 50.??%

ugh

Jason said...

That link is hosed b/c of traffic. CLTV has Moore @ 50% w/ Gordon @ 31% w/ 21% reporting..

proGun said...

ALDERMAN - 49TH WARD
Precincts Reported: 9 of 42
Joe Moore 720 (49%)
Don Gordon 445 (30%)
Jim Ginderske 148 (10%)
Chris Adams 136 (9%)

RP Dude said...

Two thirds of the votes counted and Joe is running a 30% lead over Gordon.....

proGun said...

ALDERMAN - 49TH WARD
Precincts Reported: 9 of 42
Joe Moore 720 (49%)
Don Gordon 445 (30%)
Jim Ginderske 148 (10%)
Chris Adams 136 (9%)

RP Dude said...

The Board of Elections' site seems to be somewhat overwhelmed. I think they might have 'misunderestimated' their bandwidth useage requirements for the show.

proGun said...

ALDERMAN - 49TH WARD
Precincts Reported: 28 of 42
Joe Moore 2488 (49%)
Don Gordon 1477 (29%)
Jim Ginderske 610 (12%)
Chris Adams 451 (8%)

killcatt said...

Moore , Joe (i) 2,488 49.50
Gordon , Don 1,477 29.39
Ginderske , Jim 610 12.14
Adams , Chris 451 8.97

http://cbs2chicago.com/electionresults/?eid=15905

This is 69% of vote returns, is this all the people that turned out?, so far barley 3,000 out of how many renters and ovwners in this ward 30000? These are just plain awlful numbers, when you have low numbers and 4 candidatesm the favor usulaly goes to the inc.

eyesoneastlake said...

will there be a runoff if JM doesn't get 50.1% or greater?

murlat said...

We have a run off !!!

The North Coast said...

We depend upon the mainstream media for factual information, so there is no excuse for WGN's little 'test'. Their numbers had Don closing in very closely on Moore.

Scott said...

Can JoMo dispute the results and get a recount, or are we assured a runoff in April? 49.33 is WAYYYY to close for comfort.

jon said...

its a runoff. then I'm coming back into the ward to help beat joe moore. 16 years ago his messege was we can do better - then what has he done???

rogerspark60645 said...
This post has been removed by the author.

Become a 'Broken Heart' Follower

'Broken Heart' Past Blogs

Translate the 'Broken Heart' of Rogers Park



Dummies Guide to Google Blogger Beta